A Cautionary Tale of Stopping New Donor Acquisition

Share Button

As I’ve shared before, one of our most common analyses, sadly, is projecting what happens to a donor file’s active counts if an organization decides to discontinue new donor acquisition – after all, new donor acquisition is just too expensive.

Well, today’s graph is not a projection . . . but a real-life example of what happens to donor file when an organization stops acquiring new donors for just two years.

Figure 1: Active Donor Counts

Not sure I need to say anything else. What a total unmitigated disaster.

In just two years of not acquiring new donors, this organization’s active donor counts were cut in half.

This organization now faces the dim prospect of having to invest more in new donor acquisition over the next several years just to get back to where they were in FY17.

So unnecessary.

If you (or your client) is considering such a decision, please, please, show them this graph.


  1. avatar

    Self inflicted damage to long term revenue growth.

  2. avatar

    Frightening stuff. Thanks for sharing this graph. I’ll definitely share this around the office.

  3. avatar

    That kind of strategy is usually driven by the finance department or the finance committee of the board. They see the expense and think very short term. It takes time for those new donors to become productive, 3-5 years. But, as you say, stop acquisition and the file will shrink. The first year things don’t seem so bad, but the second year you really feel it. And it takes 2-4 new donors to create the same value as a lost multi-year donor.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *